Stephen Harper with face paint on showing his support for the globalist agenda.
I know the World Leaders/Traitors want to put their best face forward as they attempt to usher in world tyranny….So… if you’ve got an idea for face paint Harper or your favorite Leader/Traitor might wear? Send it and I’ll post it.
Editor:
This is rich! Scientists living “High on the Hog” pushing the MMGW/climate-change fraud, now find themselves victims of fraud. Ironic ain’t it.
We should applaud these fine upstanding folks for putting a hurt……..if only minor, on these criminals that are destroying our economies and countries with their phony science.
May I live long enough to see them all behind bars where they belong.
I’m talking about the climate fraudsters, not the ones burning them for hotel fees.
Climate scientists targeted for fraud
By Richard Black Environment correspondent, BBC News
Fraudsters are targeting climate scientists with fake conferences in a bid to make cash and obtain details.
Scientists are sent e-mail invitations and directed to a fake conference website – often written using language taken from real scientific meetings.
Typically they are told their travel costs will be refunded – but they have to pay first to reserve a hotel room.
London appears to be their venue of choice, with some invitations imitating the names of top hotels.
One currently live website advertises a conference in Febuary, run by the “Global Warming Volunteer Group” and claiming to “focus on the risks and opportunities posed to society by global warming and… promote the exchange of ideas and learning across the Globe”.
The venue is given as the Crown London Hotel – whose address is the same as the real-life Crowne Plaza, just round the corner from Buckingham Palace.
Staff at the Crowne Plaza confirmed they have had at least one call enquiring about the non-existent conference.
The design of the website closely matches that of another supposed London-based conference, this time organised by the “Climate Change Working Group”, scheduled for late January at an address in North London that is actually a pet shop.
Global warning
Together with Langston James “Kimo” Goree VI, of the International Institute for Sustainable Development in New York, Lee Schipper recently circulated an e-mail to people in the climate change community warning of the scams.
Mr Goree runs a reporting service called the Earth Negotiations Bulletin, which gives detailed accounts of proceedings in fora such as the UN climate summits.
“The scammers have lifted entire portions of the IISD website, doing a search and replace to find IISD and replace it with their own fake name and creating a fake website that they use to fool people into believing that they are legitimate,” he said.
“The fake website is very cleverly done… they do speak the ‘lingo’ fluently.”
This is borne out by the “Global Warming Volunteer Group” website, which boasts a scientific programme and a “peer-review” panel to decide which talks to feature, says that proceedings will be published in a scientific journal, and claims a hook-up with the real-life Carbon Zero Project to make the conference carbon neutral.
The “conference” claims to be sponsored by companies such as energy giant BP, accountants PriceWaterhouse Coopers and the National Australia Bank – as well as the “Crown London Hotel”.
There are some indications of fakery, though, including citing the UK Government’s Department of Climate Change – which does not exist – as a supporter.
A spokesman for BP told the BBC: “We can find no evidence that BP is a sponsor or otherwise connected with the conference advertised on this website.
“We are attempting to contact the organisers for clarification, and our trademarks team will also be checking the website’s use of our company name and logo.”
Image via Wikipedia
Time is running out folks…time to start jailing the traitors and bringing them before a people’s court.
1st collector for American/Canadian/Australian/British/European O…
Follow my videos on vodpod
By Dan Collyns BBC News, Lima
The state of emergency was declared in 16 of Peru’s 24 regions.
This week Peru’s capital, Lima, recorded its lowest temperatures in 46 years at 8C, and the emergency measures apply to several of its outlying districts.
In Peru’s hot and humid Amazon region, temperatures dropped as low as 9C. The jungle region has recorded five cold spells this year.
Hundreds of people – nearly half of them very young children – have died of cold-related diseases, such as pneumonia – BBC
The Peruvian govt. is trying in vain to contact Mr. “Hot Air” Gore.
The govt. believes only Gore can save Peru. The hope is, by using his ability to blow mass amounts of hot air, Mr. Gore can push back the cold and save Peru. If you know the whereabouts of “Big AL” please contact him and ask him to call Peru immediately.
Editor:
I would like to thank the folks at Global warming denial for including this blog in their list. Inclusion with the many great organizations who work so hard to expose the Fraud of MMGW/Climate Change, is truly an honour.
Click image to see print
Space and Science Research Center P.O. Box 607841 Orlando, FL 32860 www.spaceandscience.net 407-394-9089 Press Release SSRC 2-2010 Food and Ethanol Shortages Imminent as Earth Enters New Cold Climate Era
Monday, May 10, 2010
11:30 AM
The Space and Science Research Center (SSRC), the leading independent research organization in the United States on the subject of the next climate change, issues today the following warning of imminent crop damage expected to produce food and ethanol shortages for the US and Canada:
Over the next 30 months, global temperatures are expected to make another dramatic drop even greater than that seen during the 2007-2008 period. As the Earth’s current El Nino dissipates, the planet will return to the long term temperature decline brought on by the Sun’s historic reduction in output, the on-going “solar hibernation.” In follow-up to the specific global temperature forecast posted in SSRC Press Release 4-2009, the SSRC advises that in order to return to the long term decline slope from the current El Nino induced high temperatures, a significant global cold weather re-direction must occur. According to SSRC Director John Casey, “The Earth typically makes adjustments in major temperature spikes within two to three years. In this case as we cool down from El Nino, we are dealing with the combined effects of this planetary thermodynamic normalization and the influence of the more powerful underlying global temperature downturn brought on by the solar hibernation. Both forces will present the first opportunity since the period of Sun-caused global warming period ended to witness obvious harmful agricultural impacts of the new cold climate. Analysis shows that food and crop derived fuel will for the first time, become threatened in the next two and a half years. Though the SSRC does not get involved with short term weather prediction, it would not be unusual to see these ill-effects this year much less within the next 30 months.”
The SSRC further adds that the severity of this projected near term decline may be on the order of 0.9 C to 1.1 C from present levels. Surprising cold weather fronts will adversely impact all northern grain crops including of course wheat and the corn used in ethanol for automotive fuel.
In pointing out the importance and reliability of this new temperature forecast and its effects on North American crops, Director Casey adds,” The SSRC has been the only US independent research organization to correctly predict in advance three of the most important events in all of climate science history. We accurately announced beforehand, the end of global warming, a long term drop in the Earth’s temperatures and most importantly the advent of a historic drop in the Sun’s output, a solar hibernation. The US government’s leading science organizations, NASA and NOAA have completely missed all three, as of course have United Nations climate change experts. It is only because of the amount of expected criticism we received because of our strong opposition to the Obama administration’s climate change policies and our declaration of the end of global warming, that the SSRC is not more fully accepted for its leadership role in climate change forecasting. The facts and reliability surrounding our well publicized predictions however stand as testament to the SSRC’s proven ability to understand the nature of global climate change. In view of the importance of this new forecast I have notified the Secretary of Agriculture to take immediate actions to prepare the nation’s agricultural industry for the coming crop damage.”
The SSRC places only one caveat on this forecast. Casey elaborates, “Only a stronger solar cycle with a period longer than the 206 year cycle can cause us to alter our projections. Although more research is needed in this area, none have yet shown themselves. The present hibernation is proceeding in almost lock step as the last one which occurred from 1793 to 1830. If it continues on present course, while the cold weather impacts on food and fuel announced today are certainly important, they do not compare with what is to follow later. At the bottom of the cold cycle of this hibernation in the late 2020’s and 2030’s there will likely be years with devastating to total crop losses in the Canadian and northern US grain regions.”
Letter to USDA Secretary Vilsack
SSRC Research Report 1-2010 (Preliminary)
Letter To Senate Environment and Public Works Committee Members
A catastrophic heat wave appears to be closing in on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. How hot is it getting in the scientific kitchen where they’ve been cooking the books and spicing up the stew pots? So hot, apparently, that Andrew Weaver, probably Canada’s leading climate scientist, is calling for replacement of IPCC leadership and institutional reform.
If Andrew Weaver is heading for the exits, it’s a pretty sure sign that the United Nations agency is under monumental stress. Mr. Weaver, after all, has been a major IPCC science insider for years. He is Canada Research Chair in Climate Modelling and Analysis at the University of Victoria, mastermind of one of the most sophisticated climate modelling systems on the planet, and lead author on two recent landmark IPCC reports.
For him to say, as he told Canwest News yesterday, that there has been some “dangerous crossing” of the line between climate advocacy and science at the IPCC is stunning in itself.
The quote above is from an article by Terence Corcoran at the National Post: Climate Agency Going Up in Flames.
With all the evidence of trickery, deceit and outright fraud now exposed via “climategate”, reputable scientists are left with little choice than to distance themselves from the IPCC and its cronies. I have a feeling that this is just the first wave.
Update: More from the Windsor Star:
A senior Canadian climate scientist says the United Nations’ panel on global warming has become tainted by political advocacy, that its chairman should resign, and that its approach to science should be overhauled.
and from Christopher Booker at the Telegraph: Pachauri: the real story behind the Glaciergate scandal
I can report a further dramatic twist to what has inevitably been dubbed “Glaciergate” – the international row surrounding the revelation that the latest report on global warming by the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) contained a wildly alarmist, unfounded claim about the melting of Himalayan glaciers. Last week, the IPCC, led by its increasingly controversial chairman, Dr Rajendra Pachauri, was forced to issue an unprecedented admission: the statement in its 2007 report that Himalayan glaciers could disappear by 2035 had no scientific basis, and its inclusion in the report reflected a “poor application” of IPCC procedures.
What has now come to light, however, is that the scientist from whom this claim originated, Dr Syed Hasnain, has for the past two years been working as a senior employee of The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI), the Delhi-based company of which Dr Pachauri is director-general. Furthermore, the claim – now disowned by Dr Pachauri as chairman of the IPCC – has helped TERI to win a substantial share of a $500,000 grant from one of America’s leading charities, along with a share in a three million euro research study funded by the EU.
Emphasis added. Those who dismiss scientific articles from global warming “deniers” always like to cite that these articles have no weight because they are not peer-reviewed. Through Climategate we learned of the efforts of “warmist” scientist to thwart the peer review process for articles they found critical. How do they now explain the revelation that the IPCC itself is full of non-peer reviewed papers of little merit?
Update #2: now there’s Amazongate via Prisonplanet:
Here’s the latest development, courtesy of Dr Richard North – and it’s a cracker. It seems that, not content with having lied to us about shrinking glaciers, increasing hurricanes, and rising sea levels, the IPCC’s latest assessment report also told us a complete load of porkies about the danger posed by climate change to the Amazon rainforest.
A dog named Kyoto
Technorati Tags: ipcc.united nations, al gore, david suzuki, fraud, scam, climate, global warming
History of climate gets ‘erased’ online
History of climate gets ‘erased’ online
More than 5,000 entries tailored to hype global-warming agenda
Posted: December 21, 2009
8:32 pm EasternBy Chelsea Schilling
© 2009 WorldNetDaily“Solomon revealed that Connolley, one man in the nine-member team who is a U.K. scientist, a software engineer and Green Party activist, took control of Wikipedia’s entries to see that any trace of the true climate history would be erased.”
A new report reveals a British scientist and Wikipedia administrator rewrote climate history, editing more than 5,000 unique articles in the online encyclopedia to cover traces of a medieval warming period – something Climategate scientists saw as a major roadblock in the effort to spread the global warming message.
Recently hacked e-mails from the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit expose a plot to eliminate the Medieval Warm Period, a 400-year era that began around A.D. 1000, the Financial Post’s Lawrence Solomon reports.
The warming period is said to have improved agriculture and increased life spans, but scientists at the center of the Climategate e-mail scandal believed the era undermined their goal of spreading concern about global warming as it pertains to today’s climate.
Solomon noted the warming period presented a dilemma long before the Climategate e-mail scandal.
A 1995 e-mail predating the recent Climate Research Unit scandal was sent to geophysicist David Deming. A major climate-change researcher told Deming, “We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period.”
Some scientists later expressed concern about erasing the period.
Get “Global Warming or Global Governance? What the media refuse to tell you about so-called climate change” at the WND Superstore.
One chief practitioner identified as Keith Briffa, said in a Sept. 22, 1999, e-mail, “I know there is pressure to present a nice tidy story as regards ‘apparent unprecedented warming in a thousand years or more in the proxy data’ but in reality the situation is not quite so simple. … I believe that the recent warmth was probably matched about 1,000 years ago.”
Briffa and other scientists, with the help of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, published a well-known symbol of their movement: the hockey stick chart, an illustration reproduced in textbooks, media reports and the pages of the 2001 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, or IPCC, report.
Hockey-stick chart (omitting Medieval Warm Period) as it appeared in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2001 report
However, the graph showed stable temperatures over the last 1,000 years and omitted any indication of the warming period.
“But the U.N.’s official verdict that the Medieval Warm Period had not existed did not erase the countless schoolbooks, encyclopedias, and other scholarly sources that claimed it had,” Solomon wrote. “Rewriting those would take decades, time that the band members didn’t have if they were to save the globe from warming.”
Instead, the group created a website called RealClimate.org. One e-mail addressed criticism of the hockey stick graph and any suggestions that today’s temperatures were not the hottest on record.
“The idea is that we working climate scientists should have a place where we can mount a rapid response to supposedly ‘bombshell’ papers that are doing the rounds” in aid of “combating dis-information,” a Dec. 10, 2004, e-mail to the Climate Research Unit from Gavin Schmidt explained.
Excerpt from Gavin Schmidt’s Dec. 10, 2004, e-mail
The RealClimate.org team consisted of Schmidt, Mike Mann, Eric Steig, William Connolley, Stefan Rahmstorf, Ray Bradley, Amy Clement, Rasmus Benestad and Caspar Ammann.
Solomon revealed that Connolley, one man in the nine-member team who is a U.K. scientist, a software engineer and Green Party activist, took control of Wikipedia’s entries to see that any trace of the true climate history would be erased.
Continue Reading
Technorati Tags: Wikipedia, History of climate gets ‘erased’ online, climategate, climate change, global warming
Climate-change action needs a Pearl Harbor moment – The Globe and Mail
Editor: This is by far the most preposterous article ever written on global warming/climate change I’ve read to date and I’ve read a ton of them.
I’ve said for years that if you want to get to the truth, where govt.and media are concerned, flip the story 180 degrees and the truth will stare you in the face. This article is a perfect example.
“Every leader said the same thing. The climate-change science is real”.
We all know most leaders, if not all, are chronic liars, so we have no reason to believe their global warming story.
Throughout the article the writer refers to one scam after the other. He asks us to believe each as truth. Well they weren’t true as presented by media and govt. and neither is global warming.
Global warming/climate change is just one more case of fear mongering.
The fact this story was presented in the Globe and Mail shows the depths to which the media has sunk.
Finally, it seems appropriate the writer hails from Rome – it was after-all the “Club of Rome” that came up with the idea of using global warming to strike fear into the masses. “Therefore, man is the real enemy” Think about that.
Global warming is a fraud – period – end of subject.
Jail the small group of psychotic elitists that have perpetrated all the evil scams and wars on the peoples of this earth and you will find the earth is a much more hospitable place to call home.
Eric Reguly
Rome — From Tuesday’s Globe and Mail Published on Monday, Dec. 21Every leader said the same thing. The climate-change science is real. The need to act now is urgent. The end is nigh. “Hurricanes, floods, typhoons and droughts that were once all regarded as the acts of an invisible God are now revealed to be the visible acts of man,” Britain’s Gordon Brown said.
“We come here in Copenhagen because climate change poses a grave and growing danger to our people,” Barack Obama said. A weak climate change deal would be “an invitation to Africa to sign a suicide pact,” the Sudanese ambassador said.
And so on, times 193 countries. And then nothing.
Copenhagen’s dud status shows that perverse disaster psychology is alive and well – no disaster meant no action. That’s unlikely to change until the climate change story has its Pearl Harbor moment, an event so catastrophic, so violent, that it instantly mobilizes entire countries. By then, of course, it may be too late.
The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor on Dec. 7, 1941, immediately put the United States on war footing. The economy and society were transformed virtually overnight. Detroit’s car factories pumped out tanks and bombers. Millions of women worked the armaments lines while their men went to war in the Pacific and in Europe.
A similar scenario unfolded after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. Two wars were launched. Last year, the financial crisis and the recession triggered bank bailouts, stimulus spending and liquidity injections valued at trillions of dollars around the world. April’s G20 summit in London showed that countries can move with alacrity to fight a common threat.
What could climate change’s Pearl Harbor look like? If you read the literature from the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, it could be a sudden shift in the ocean currents – known as the ocean conveyor – that transport warm water from the Southern Hemisphere to the Northern Hemisphere. It might be extreme bouts of El Nino (the periodic warming of Pacific Ocean surface temperatures), or La Nina (Pacific cooling), either of which could trigger catastrophic floods, droughts and other forms of extreme weather, as they have in the past.
It might be a massive African or Asian drought that wipes out crops across several countries. The Australian drought in 2009, where rainfall in some parts of country was a mere 5 per cent to 10 per cent of historical totals, gave us a hint of the agricultural and economic devastation that one dry year can produce. Imagine the same weather pattern in a poor, densely populated country such as Pakistan. Josette Sheeran, the executive director of United Nations World Food Program, the world’s biggest humanitarian agency, said hungry people do one of three things: “They riot, they migrate or they die.”
The opening lines of the Copenhagen Accord read: “We underline that climate change is one of the greatest challenges of our time. We emphasize our strong political will to urgently combat climate change.”
The words “climate change” simply don’t trigger collective fear, at least in the rich world, which thinks it can overcome any problem by throwing money at it. Until an environmental Pearl Harbor happens, climate change is likely to stay on the political and economic security sidelines. Copenhagen showed that. Some 120 leaders pleaded for “urgent” action and the message was lost for want of a body-strewn image to go with it.
Eric Reguly recently returned to Rome after two weeks in Copenhagen providing daily coverage of the climate-change conference
Technorati Tags: Climate-change action needs a Pearl Harbor moment
